efrenchaux.com

Summary: Mitsubishi’s decision to rename its Pajero SUV in Spanish-speaking markets – where the term is a vulgar slang word – serves as a strategic example of cultural intelligence (CQ) in action. Rather than responding to public backlash, the company proactively identified the linguistic risk and adapted its branding accordingly, demonstrating all four CQ capabilities: knowledge, strategy, drive, and action. For leaders of global teams, this case underscores a broader imperative: naming conventions for teams, initiatives, and internal programs must be vetted not only for translation accuracy but for cultural resonance and appropriateness. Misalignment between language and local context can damage credibility and dilute strategic intent. Effective leaders embed cultural review into their communication processes, ensuring that language supports rather than undermines global alignment and trust.

---

In global business, language is never neutral. Words carry not only meaning, but cultural weight, subtext, and potential for misunderstanding. Nowhere is this more evident than in the case of Mitsubishi Motors’ vehicle naming strategy – a textbook demonstration of how culturally intelligent organizations can preempt reputational damage by aligning language with intent across diverse markets.

This article examines Mitsubishi’s proactive renaming of the “Pajero” vehicle in Spanish-speaking countries. More than a branding adjustment, it reflects a disciplined application of cultural intelligence (CQ). For leaders of global teams, the implications extend beyond marketing. Team names, initiative titles, and goal statements must all be vetted through a cultural lens to ensure alignment of meaning and message. Here’s how.

CQ Knowledge: Recognizing Cultural-Linguistic Risk

Cultural intelligence begins with knowledge – specifically, understanding how language and behavior vary across cultures. Mitsubishi or its market intelligence teams correctly identified that “Pajero” is a vulgar slang term in several Spanish-speaking countries. This was not a reaction to public backlash, but a preemptive identification of linguistic risk.

This underscores a critical point: surface-level translation is insufficient. Organizations must embed sociolinguistic knowledge into their naming conventions and internal communications – not just product names. Had Mitsubishi lacked this insight, the name could have triggered brand damage and consumer rejection. Instead, they treated language as an operational risk factor – and mitigated accordingly.

CQ Strategy: Planning with Cultural Foresight

Strategic cultural intelligence involves planning, awareness, and testing assumptions. Mitsubishi’s decision to rename the vehicle as “Montero” in Spanish-speaking markets and “Shogun” in others reflects deliberate scenario planning. They anticipated negative reception, assessed the potential cost, and adapted before launch.

Critically, they challenged the assumption that a name acceptable in Japan or neutral in English would carry the same reception globally. For global HR leaders, this serves as a clear lesson: team names, internal initiatives, and branded values must be tested across cultural and linguistic filters. A clever name in one context may sound tone-deaf or offensive in another. Strategy demands preemptive inquiry, not reactive apology.

CQ Drive: Motivation to Align Messaging with Markets

CQ Drive is the motivation to operate effectively in cross-cultural environments. Mitsubishi’s willingness to incur the costs of rebranding – redesign, marketing, distribution – signals more than commercial caution. It reflects a cultural commitment: prioritizing market fit over global consistency.

This mindset is essential for global managers. When naming a leadership program or setting public team goals, the objective is clarity, not cleverness. Leaders must be willing to adapt language to local sensitivities, even if it means revising what works at headquarters. The cost of adaptation is far less than the cost of miscommunication or cultural offense.

CQ Action: Executing the Right Behavioral Adjustments

The final component – CQ Action – involves behavioral adaptation. Mitsubishi’s ultimate renaming of the Pajero demonstrates this in practice. They did not simply identify the problem; they acted decisively to resolve it.

For organizational leaders, CQ Action means embedding cultural vetting into communication workflows. When naming cross-border teams, defining global OKRs, or rolling out branded internal campaigns, behavioral flexibility is paramount. Language must not only translate – it must resonate. Effective leaders design for understanding, not just distribution.

Conclusion

The Mitsubishi Pajero case can be a perfect case study in operationalizing cultural intelligence to protect reputation and enhance clarity. For global leaders, the implications are immediate: language used internally – for teams, programs, values – must be tested for cultural fit and linguistic alignment.

When meaning is misaligned with intent, trust is eroded. But when organizations take cultural nuance seriously, they earn the credibility to lead across borders. Mitsubishi’s example shows that success isn’t just about what we say – it’s about how, where, and to whom we say it.

If your organization is scaling globally, Filta can help you structure culturally intelligent communications, from team design to internal initiatives. Avoid the unseen pitfalls – align your language with your intent.